Home » Reviews

Recent Additions

 

Planet of the Apes (2001)

Mark Wahlberg, Tim Roth
Rating: 7.5 / 10.0
by The TopFiveMovies Staff
(August 03, 2001)

With members of Top Five Movies flung far and wide throughout the country, opportunities for us to watch movies together have become scarce. All that changed this weekend as writers Ryan DeMotte, Greg Kline, Jagan Nicholas Ranjan, and Brian Sproul joined up near Akron, OH for a special viewing of Planet of the Apes. The outing was preceded by an exhausting game of football as well as numerous objections by Sproul, who acknowledged a bias against the film's star, Marky-Mark Wahlberg.

We nevertheless proceeded to the cinema and sat back to enjoy the film. Along the way I'm sure we annoyed some fellow patrons as we whispered our thoughts and theories throughout the proceedings, but our actions paled in comparison to the woman who received a cell-phone call in mid-movie. The group consensus seemed to be that the movie was enjoyable and even satisfying, though some felt the need to qualify that with the phrase "... for a movie with talking monkeys." Below are some comments from each member about the experience...

Ryan Says:

I went into "Planet of the Apes" expecting very little. The combination of a seemingly corny plot and Mark Wahlberg was destined for failure. However, after 2 hours of the epic human struggle against ape domination, I was converted. First, Tim Burton did for "Planet of the Apes" what he did for "Batman", creating a dark and disturbing feel for the movie through settings and costumes. Second, Thade and Attar were masterful as the main antagonists. Thade, a bloodthirsty general whose habit of hissing and sniffing made him completely revolting and evil. I did think he was a fascist, but then fascists don't show as much deference to the Senate. Thade patiently waited for martial law to be declared before moving his troops. Attar was equally convincing. I have been caught bellowing "BOW YOUR HEADS" not a few times since seeing the movie. The third and most fascinating part was the ending. The time travel issues involved are still unresolved and left me thinking about the movie for a long time afterwards. All in all, it was a great movie. An 8.5/10.

Greg Says:

The comparisons of this movie to the original are inevitable, but I'd like to think that some of the film's lesser moments were actually intentional bits of campiness intended to pay homage to its predecessor. This is clearly more of an action film than a thought-provoking sci-fi piece, but the issues of time travel and the creation of the planet injected some intelligence into what otherwise might have disintegrated into yet another Hollywood blockbuster. The aggressive animal nature of the apes in this film contrasts greatly with their civilized personalities in the original and is a bit unsettling at first, but I think Burton may have intended it as a parallel to mankind's own beastly nature. Look for Charlton Heston in a well disguised cameo. Overall I rate it 7 opposable thumbs up.

Jagan Says:

A love triangle between two humans and an ape? I wasn't too sure about that. The character development in this movie was zero as was the development of almost all of the relationships. That being said, parts of this movie reminded me of 'Contact' (a very good thing); and the ending was superb and basically saved the movie in my mind. Bottom line: 7.0 rating

Brian Says:

I fought it hard. I swore I would not watch it. To be honest with you, I've never been interested in the originals. But to avoid being the party pooper, i "strapped it on" for the gang. I was pleasantly surprised by the film's depth even though there were too many instances of enormous cheese-ity. To clarify: I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH MARK WAHLBERG. This was a little misguided and rather a tendency to associate him with mass-audience films that cost a schluckazillion bucks to make. This may not even be the case, just pure stereotyping on my part. Wahlberg turned in a solid performance. Anywhoo, I thought that there were some interesting lessons to be drawn from the film regarding not only relationships between man and animal, but man and fellow man. Its message was loud and clear, meant for the masses-- not sneaky for the cerebral. And the ending would've had Dr. Emmitt Brown hitting his head on the porcelain a couple more times to figure out. The film was worth my time.

Staff Responses

Matt Cooper says:
I hope the ending isn't anything like another Marky-Mark film, "Boogie Nights" eeewww